On War

Reaching back past 4,000 BC (According to Usher’s dating) the first thing we encounter after creation is spiritual warfare. In many ways, Genesis 3 details man’s inability to comprehend and execute war in the spiritual domain. Arthur C. Clarke once said that high technology for the uninitiated seems like magic. For 6,000 years, war in the spiritual realms still seems like magic. Beyond point and click or surfing from our mobile devices, the Cyber Domain of war is like magic. Yet, it is pedestrian magic in that we use cell phones, ATMs, online banking, and surf the web for remedies ranging from ED to Warts. What makes it Magic is that few of us understand how it happens and what makes it pedestrian is that we use it all the time.
Most of us miss the fact that in our pedestrian wireless / cell based / computing devices, new technologies create new modes, or domains, of war. Existing theories of war are, of necessity, re-evaluated to adapt them to new capabilities of war fighting. The most obvious example of this was the development of theories of war after the introduction of heavier-than-air aircraft in the early 20th Century. Cyberspace, as a domain of war, is new and pervasive. In briefly addressing a theory of war in cyberspace, my greater purpose is to carry this thought process into the spiritual domain of war. I can see you rolling your eyes, already, accusing me of being another Dipwad trying to define the undefinable. For those who stick with me, striving to make sense of spiritual war, we might discover a few rational ideas to help make sense of our world as it hurtles toward Disorder.

First things first, let’s take a hard look at the cyber domain of war. Keep the concept of spiritual war in the back of your mind. Defining cyber war makes it necessary to change currently understood theories of war to make them applicable to the unique characteristics of cyberspace. I will not Geek out too much on this but Cyber war is about war from and war within the cyber domain.

Likewise, Spiritual war appears to have the same dual nature with war executed from the spiritual domain and war executed within the spiritual domain. War from cyberspace is distinctly Western while war within cyberspace is distinctly not so. For Christians, war from the spiritual domain is preaching, teaching, administration, and the things that become reality in the framework of length, width, depth and time present. War within the spiritual domain wraps around prophecy, healing, tongues, faith, focuses on a timeless creator. War within the spiritual domain is an invisible war of thrones, dominions, principalities and powers. In other words, war from the spiritual domain is comfortable and visible because it arrives in the present and we can wrap our brains around it. War within the spiritual domain is far beyond our understanding and distinctly not comfortable at all. It suffices that one of the attributes that spiritual war and cyber war have is that they crush our commonly held assumptions.

Here is a brief look at the Domains of War in Western Thought:
• Land Domain: The simplest of war domains, combatants can make war with rocks and sticks.
• Sea Doman: Combatants must have sufficient technology to create stable platforms on the ocean from which soldiers and sailors can fight.
• Air Domain: Technology developed this domain with flight capable platforms that proved to be as revolutionary as the development of the Roman cohort in the land domain.
• Space Domain: orbital platforms take war to new elevations and new sensor platforms
• Cyber Domain: Technology is turning this domain into a place where the fight can occur anytime, anywhere.
• Quantum Domain: With Quantum research and even time travel under serious discussion, this is like the cyber domain of war but it straddles the 10 dimensions of creation. It is not limited by length, width, depth, and time present.

In the late 1990s, Admiral Arthur Cebrowski proposed the concept of Network-Centric Warfare as the basis for a theory of war from cyberspace. That is, Cebrowski formulated a theory for using the capabilities of cyberspace to fight wars in the other domains. Once the capability existed to project force from this new domain into other domains, capabilities to wage war within the new domain soon follow. With the nascent establishment of Cyber forces, we are now exploring how to wage war within the cyber domain. Spiritual Warfare executed within the spiritual domain and from the spiritual domain is at least a 6,000 year old capability. The key is that in a world plunging toward disorder with old men dreaming dreams and young men receiving visions, execution of spiritual war is taking on components of force, friction, strategic mobility, and asymmetric warfare like never before.

Carl von Clausewitz wrote in his tome, ‘On War,’ that, ‘Wars in every period have independent forms and independent conditions, and, therefore, every period must have its independent theory of war.’

With the advent of the information age, we have created cyberspace as a domain of war and need a theoretical framework in which to understand it. Mindful of the sin of hubris, this column and the next one attempts to address war in cyberspace from a theoretical perspective and provide a framework based on eight tenets. In turn, it is critical to embrace the parallel war in the Spiritual domain because evidence indicates that the velocity of what might be coming, and the death that will sweep the world, will be Old Testament in Nature but much greater velocity.

Again, this is a lot of David Aucsmith and his magnificent work, “A Theory of Cyber War.”

Next time, Aucsmith’s eight tenets of cyber war and my feeble attempt to use them to frame Spiritual War.


HellSomeone sent this to me years ago and it was sitting on my hard drive when I found it.  Regretfully, I do not know the source nor can I claim credit for this document.  If anyone knows the source of this hilarious tale, please send it to me so I can give proper credit.

A thermodynamics professor gave his graduate students a take home exam. It had one question:

“Is hell exothermic or endothermic? Support your answer with a proof.”

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law or some variant to show either that hell was exothermic (generating heat faster than it is lost, resulting in a buildup of heat) or endothermic (generating heat slower than it is lost, resulting in a loss of heat).

One student, however, wrote the following:

First we must postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? i.e. what is the rate of change of mass of hell. I think that we can assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave. Eternal damnation is pretty much final. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Many of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions, and people generally do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that everyone is damned by lack of adherence to one religion or another, and so all people and all souls go to hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell, and therefore its mass, to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass (of souls) and the volume needs to stay constant. We arrive therefore at two possible hypotheses:

  1. If hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.
  2. On the other hand, if hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.

So which is it?  If we accept the postulate given to me by Therese Banyan during Freshman year that :  “It’ll be a cold night in hell before I go out with you” … and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in taking her on a date, then Hypothesis 2 cannot be true. Hence, hypothesis 1 must be correct:  Hell is exothermic.

 The student got the only A in the class.

In the Collective, we find Death, Taxes, and that All Lies are Equally True